TWO Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

Fair Value (Notes)

Fair Value (Notes)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2014

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices available in active markets (i.e., observable inputs) and the lowest priority to data lacking transparency (i.e., unobservable inputs). Additionally, ASC 820 requires an entity to consider all aspects of nonperformance risk, including the entity’s own credit standing, when measuring fair value of a liability.

ASC 820 establishes a three level hierarchy to be used when measuring and disclosing fair value. An instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation. Following is a description of the three levels:


Level 1	Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date under current market conditions. Additionally, the entity must have the ability to access the active market and the quoted prices cannot be adjusted by the entity.


Level 2	Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or liabilities; or inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means for substantially the full-term of the assets or liabilities.


Level 3	Unobservable inputs are supported by little or no market activity. The unobservable inputs represent the assumptions that market participants would use to price the assets and liabilities, including risk. Generally, Level 3 assets and liabilities are valued using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that require significant judgment or estimation.

Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies used to measure material assets and liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models and significant assumptions utilized.

Investment securities. The Company holds a portfolio of AFS and trading securities that are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. AFS securities are primarily comprised of Agency and non-Agency RMBS while the Company’s U.S. Treasuries are classified as trading securities. The Company determines the fair value of its U.S. Treasuries and Agency RMBS based upon prices obtained from third-party pricing providers or broker quotes received using bid price, which are deemed indicative of market activity. The third-party pricing providers and brokers use pricing models that generally incorporate such factors as coupons, primary and secondary mortgage rates, rate reset period, issuer, prepayment speeds, credit enhancements and expected life of the security. In determining the fair value of its non-Agency RMBS, management judgment may be used to arrive at fair value that considers prices obtained from third-party pricing providers, broker quotes received and other applicable market data. If observable market prices are not available or insufficient to determine fair value due to principally illiquidity in the marketplace, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, and credit losses). The Company classified 100% of its U.S. Treasuries as Level 1 fair value assets at December 31, 2014. The Company classified 100% of its RMBS AFS securities reported at fair value as Level 2 at December 31, 2014. AFS and trading securities account for 73.7% and 10.3% of all assets reported at fair value at December 31, 2014, respectively.

Equity securities. The Company previously held shares of Silver Bay common stock that were carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet as a result of a fair value option election. The Company determined fair value of these equity securities based on the closing market price at period end. Because the shares were distributed to the Company’s stockholders in April 2013, equity securities are no longer recognized on the consolidated balance sheet.

Mortgage loans held-for-sale. The Company holds mortgage loans held-for-sale that are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet as a result of a fair value option election. The Company determines fair value of its mortgage loans based on prices obtained from third-party pricing providers and other applicable market data. If observable market prices are not available or insufficient to determine fair value due principally to illiquidity in the marketplace, then fair value is based upon cash flow models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels and credit losses). The Company classified 93.4% and 6.6% of its mortgage loans held-for-sale as Level 2 and Level 3 fair value assets, respectively, at December 31, 2014.

Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts. The Company recognizes on its consolidated balance sheet mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts that are carried at fair value as a result of a fair value option election. The Company determines fair value of its mortgage loans based on prices obtained from third-party pricing providers and other applicable market data. If observable market prices are not available or insufficient to determine fair value due principally to illiquidity in the marketplace, then fair value is based upon cash flow models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels and credit losses). The Company classified 100% of its mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts as Level 2 fair value assets at December 31, 2014.

Mortgage servicing rights. The Company holds a portfolio of MSR that are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company determines fair value of its MSR based on prices obtained from third-party pricing providers. Although MSR transactions are observable in the marketplace, the valuation is based upon cash flow models that include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels and discount rates). As a result, the Company classified 100% of its MSR as Level 3 fair value assets at December 31, 2014.

Derivative instruments. The Company may enter into a variety of derivative financial instruments as part of its hedging strategies. The Company principally executes over-the-counter, or OTC, derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps, swaptions, put and call options for TBAs, credit default swaps, constant maturity swaps and Markit IOS total return swaps. The Company utilizes third-party pricing providers to value its financial derivative instruments. The Company classified 100% of the interest rate swaps, swaptions put and call options for TBAs, credit default swaps, constant maturity swaps and total return swaps reported at fair value as Level 2 at December 31, 2014.

The Company also enters into certain other derivative financial instruments, such as TBAs and inverse interest-only securities. These instruments are similar in form to the Company’s AFS securities and the Company utilizes a pricing service to value TBAs and broker quotes to value inverse interest-only securities. The Company classified 100% of its inverse interest-only securities at fair value as Level 2 at December 31, 2014. The Company reported 100% of its TBAs as Level 1 as of December 31, 2014.

The Company may also enter into forward purchase commitments on mortgage loans whereby the Company commits to purchasing the loans at a particular interest rate. The fair value of these derivatives is determined based on prices currently offered in the marketplace for new commitments. Fallout assumptions if the borrower elects not to close the loan are applied to the pricing. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding commitments to purchase $554.8 million of mortgage loans, subject to fallout if the loans do not close, with a fair value asset of $1.3 million. The Company classified 100% of the forward purchase commitments reported at fair value as Level 2 at December 31, 2014.

The Company’s risk management committee governs trading activity relating to derivative instruments. The Company’s policy is to minimize credit exposure related to financial derivatives used for hedging by limiting the hedge counterparties to major banks, financial institutions, exchanges, and private investors who meet established capital and credit guidelines as well as by limiting the amount of exposure to any individual counterparty.

The Company has netting arrangements in place with all derivative counterparties pursuant to standard documentation developed by ISDA, or central clearing exchange agreements, in the case of centrally cleared interest rate swaps. Additionally, both the Company and the counterparty or clearing agency are required to post cash collateral based upon the net underlying market value of the Company’s open positions with the counterparty. Posting of cash collateral typically occurs daily, subject to certain dollar thresholds. Due to the existence of netting arrangements, as well as frequent cash collateral posting at low posting thresholds, credit exposure to the Company and/or to the counterparty or clearing agency is considered materially mitigated. Based on the Company’s assessment, there is no requirement for any additional adjustment to derivative valuations specifically for credit.

Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts. The Company recognizes on its consolidated balance sheet collateralized borrowings that are carried at fair value as a result of a fair value option election. In determining the fair value of its collateralized borrowings, management judgment may be used to arrive at fair value that considers prices obtained from third-party pricing providers, broker quotes received and other applicable market data. If observable market prices are not available or insufficient to determine fair value due to principally illiquidity in the marketplace, then fair value is based upon internally developed models that are primarily based on observable market-based inputs but also include unobservable market data inputs (including prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, and credit losses). The Company classified 100% of its collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts as Level 2 fair value liabilities at December 31, 2014.

The following tables display the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company often economically hedges the fair value change of its assets or liabilities with derivatives and other financial instruments. The tables below display the hedges separately from the hedged items, and therefore do not directly display the impact of the Company’s risk management activities.



	Recurring Fair Value Measurements
	At December 31, 2014
(in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Available-for-sale securities	$	—	$	14,341,102	$	—	$	14,341,102
Trading securities	1,997,656		—		—		1,997,656
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	—		500,159		35,553		535,712
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts	—		1,744,746		—		1,744,746
Mortgage servicing rights	—		—		452,006		452,006
Derivative assets	10,350		370,441		—		380,791
Total assets	$	2,008,006	$	16,956,448	$	487,559	$	19,452,013
Liabilities
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts	$	—	$	1,209,663	$	—	$	1,209,663
Derivative liabilities	17,687		72,546		—		90,233
Total liabilities	$	17,687	$	1,282,209	$	—	$	1,299,896



	Recurring Fair Value Measurements
	At December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Available-for-sale securities	$	—	$	12,256,727	$	—	$	12,256,727
Trading securities	1,000,180		—		—		1,000,180
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	—		119,855		424,726		544,581
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts	—		792,390		—		792,390
Mortgage servicing rights	—		—		514,402		514,402
Derivative assets	33,425		516,434		—		549,859
Total assets	$	1,033,605	$	13,685,406	$	939,128	$	15,658,139
Liabilities
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts	$	—	$	639,731	$	—	$	639,731
Derivative liabilities	125		21,956		—		22,081
Total liabilities	$	125	$	661,687	$	—	$	661,812

The Company may be required to measure certain assets or liabilities at fair value from time to time. These periodic fair value measures typically result from application of certain impairment measures under U.S. GAAP. These items would constitute nonrecurring fair value measures under ASC 820. As of December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the periods presented.

The valuation of Level 3 instruments requires significant judgment by the third-party pricing providers and/or management. The third-party pricing providers and/or management rely on inputs such as market price quotations from market makers (either market or indicative levels), original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows to determine fair value. Level 3 instruments may also be discounted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the third-party pricing provider in the absence of market information. Assumptions used by the third-party pricing provider due to lack of observable inputs may significantly impact the resulting fair value and therefore the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s valuation committee reviews all valuations that are based on pricing information received from a third-party pricing provider. As part of this review, prices are compared against other pricing or input data points in the marketplace, along with internal valuation expertise, to ensure the pricing is reasonable. In addition, the Company performs back-testing of pricing information to validate price information and identify any pricing trends of a third-party price provider.

In determining fair value, third-party pricing providers use various valuation approaches, including market and income approaches. Inputs that are used in determining fair value of an instrument may include pricing information, credit data, volatility statistics, and other factors. In addition, inputs can be either observable or unobservable.

The availability of observable inputs can vary by instrument and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is new and not yet established in the marketplace and other characteristics particular to the instrument. The third-party pricing provider uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocations. In periods of market dislocation, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified to or from various levels within the fair value hierarchy.

Securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the bid price (in the case of long positions) or the ask price (in the case of short positions) at the close of trading on the date as of which value is determined. Exchange-traded securities for which no bid or ask price is available are valued at the last traded price. OTC derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, swaptions, credit default swaps and Markit IOS total return swaps are valued by the Company using observable inputs, specifically quotations received from third-party pricing providers, and are therefore classified within Level 2.

The following table presents the reconciliation for all of the Company’s Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:



	Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
	Year Ended December 31,
	2014											2013
(in thousands)	Available-For-Sale Securities			Mortgage Loans Held-For-Sale				Mortgage Servicing Rights				Available-For-Sale Securities				Mortgage Loans Held-For-Sale				Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning of period level 3 fair value	$	—		$	424,726			$	514,402			$	1,871			$	—			$	—
Gains/(losses) included in net income:
Realized gains (losses)	—		⁽¹⁾	7,734				(54,815		)		74			⁽¹⁾	907				—
Unrealized (losses) gains	—			(3,213		)	⁽²⁾	(73,573		)	⁽⁴⁾	—				29			⁽²⁾	13,881		⁽⁴⁾
Total net gains/(losses) included in net income	—			4,521				(128,388		)		74				936				13,881
Other comprehensive income	—			—				—				1,426				—				—
Purchases	—			66,793				67,821				—				440,352				500,521
Sales	—			(433,603		)		—				—				—				—
Settlements	—			(26,884		)		(1,829		)		—				(16,562		)		—
Gross transfers into level 3	—			—				—				3,000				—				—
Gross transfers out of level 3	—			—				—				(6,371		)		—				—
End of period level 3 fair value	$	—		$	35,553			$	452,006			$	—			$	424,726			$	514,402
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings for assets held at the end of the reporting period	$	—		$	(3,028	)	⁽³⁾	$	(73,573	)	⁽⁵⁾	$	—			$	29		⁽³⁾	$	13,881	⁽⁵⁾

___________________


(1)	Realized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities represent net (premium amortization)/discount accretion recorded in interest income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.


(2)	The change in unrealized gains or losses on mortgage loans held-for-sale was recorded in gain on mortgage loans held-for-sale on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.


(3)	The change in unrealized gains or losses on mortgage loans held-for-sale that were held at the end of the reporting period was recorded in gain on mortgage loans held-for-sale on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.


(4)	The change in unrealized gains or losses on MSR was recorded in gain on servicing asset on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.


(5)	The change in unrealized gains or losses on MSR that were held at the end of the reporting period was recorded in gain on servicing asset on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

The Company did not incur transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Transfers between Levels are deemed to take place on the first day of the reporting period in which the transfer has taken place.

The Company transferred one Level 2 asset in the amount of $3.0 million into Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2013. The asset was deemed to be Level 3 based on the limited availability of third-party pricing. However, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company transferred this asset along with two other Level 3 assets in the amount of $6.4 million into Level 2. The assets were deemed to be Level 2 based on the availability of third-party pricing and corroborating market data.

The Company used a third-party pricing provider in the fair value measurement of its Level 3 mortgage loans held-for-sale. The significant unobservable inputs used by the third-party pricing provider included expected default, severity and discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in any of the inputs in isolation may result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

The Company also used a third-party pricing provider in the fair value measurement of its Level 3 MSR. The table below presents information about the significant unobservable inputs used by the third-party pricing provider in the fair value measurement of the Company’s MSR classified as Level 3 fair value assets at December 31, 2014:



December 31, 2014
Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input ⁽¹⁾	Range				Weighted Average
Discounted cash flow	Constant prepayment speed	10.6	-	13.1	%	11.9	%
	Delinquency	5.3	-	6.1	%	5.6	%
	Discount rate	8.1	-	10.7	%	9.5	%

___________________


(1)	Significant increases/(decreases) in any of the inputs in isolation may result in significantly lower/(higher) fair value measurement. A change in the assumption used for discount rates may be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the probability of delinquency and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.

Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The Company elected the fair value option for the residential mortgage loans it has acquired. The fair value option was elected to mitigate earnings volatility by better matching the accounting for the assets with the related hedges. The residential mortgage loans are carried within mortgage loans held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s policy is to separately record interest income on these fair value elected loans. Upfront fees and costs related to the fair value elected loans are not deferred or capitalized. Fair value adjustments are reported in gain (loss) on mortgage loans held-for-sale on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The fair value option is irrevocable once the loan is acquired.

The Company also elected the fair value option for the equity securities previously carried on the consolidated balance sheet, which consisted solely of shares of Silver Bay common stock. The Company determined fair value of these equity securities based on the closing market price at period end. Fair value adjustments were reported in gain (loss) on investment securities on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

The Company also elected the fair value option for both the mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts and the collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts carried on the consolidated balance sheet. The fair value option was elected to better reflect the economics of the Company’s retained interests. The Company’s policy is to separately record interest income on the fair value elected loans and interest expense on the fair value elected borrowings. Upfront fees and costs are not deferred or capitalized. Fair value adjustments are reported in other income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

The following table summarizes the fair value option elections and information regarding the amounts recognized in earnings for each fair value option-elected item.



(in thousands)	Changes included in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Year Ended December 31,	Interest income (expense)				Gain (loss) on investment securities		Gain (loss) on mortgage loans held-for-sale			Other income			Total included in net income			Change in fair value due to credit risk
2014
Assets
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	$	16,089		⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	12,568		$	—		$	28,657		$	1,295	⁽³⁾
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts	41,220			⁽¹⁾	—		—			41,125			82,345			—		⁽²⁾
Liabilities
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts	(26,760		)		—		—			(24,285		)	(51,045		)	—		⁽²⁾
Total	$	30,549			$	—	$	12,568		$	16,840		$	59,957		$	1,295
2013
Assets
Equity securities	$	—			$	7,843	$	—		$	—		$	7,843		$	—	⁽²⁾
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	22,185			⁽¹⁾	—		(13,831		)	—			8,354			6,677		⁽³⁾
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts	19,220			⁽¹⁾	—		—			(22,910		)	(3,690		)	—		⁽²⁾
Liabilities
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts	(10,937		)		—		—			37,114			26,177			—		⁽²⁾
Total	$	30,468			$	7,843	$	(13,831	)	$	14,204		$	38,684		$	6,677
2012
Assets
Equity securities	$	—			$	5,822	$	—		$	—		$	5,822		$	—	⁽²⁾
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	609			⁽¹⁾	—		(100		)	—			509			—		⁽³⁾
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts	—			⁽¹⁾	—		—			—			—			—		⁽²⁾
Liabilities
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts	—				—		—			—			—			—		⁽²⁾
Total	$	609			$	5,822	$	(100	)	$	—		$	6,331		$	—

____________________


(1)	Interest income on mortgage loans held-for-sale and held-for-investment in securitization trusts is measured by multiplying the unpaid principal balance on the loans by the coupon rate and the number of days of interest due.


(2)	The change in fair value on equity securities, mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts and collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts was due entirely to changes in market interest rates.


(3)	The change in fair value due to credit risk on mortgage loans held-for-sale was quantified by holding yield constant in the cash flow model in order to isolate the credit risk component.

The table below provides the fair value and the unpaid principal balance for the Company’s fair value option-elected loans and collateralized borrowings.



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Unpaid Principal Balance		Fair Value ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance		Fair Value ⁽¹⁾
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
Total loans	$	534,101	$	535,712	$	680,840	$	544,581
Nonaccrual loans	$	26,405	$	20,574	$	80,486	$	62,185
Loans 90+ days past due	$	25,263	$	19,675	$	63,152	$	48,786
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts
Total loans	$	1,699,748	$	1,744,746	$	812,538	$	792,390
Nonaccrual loans	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans 90+ days past due	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts
Total borrowings	$	1,218,589	$	1,209,663	$	686,233	$	639,731

____________________


(1)	Excludes accrued interest receivable.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with ASC 820, the Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the consolidated balance sheet, for which fair value can be estimated.

The following describes the Company’s methods for estimating the fair value for financial instruments. Descriptions are not provided for those items that have zero balances as of the current balance sheet date.

•

AFS securities, trading securities, mortgage loans held-for-sale, mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts, MSR, derivative assets and liabilities, and collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts are recurring fair value measurements; carrying value equals fair value. See discussion of valuation methods and assumptions within the Fair Value Measurements section of this footnote.


•	Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash have a carrying value which approximates fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these assets as Level 1.

•

As a condition to membership in the FHLB, the Company is required to purchase and hold a certain amount of FHLB stock, which is considered a non-marketable, long-term investment, and is carried at cost. Because this stock can only be redeemed or sold at its par value, and only to the FHLB, carrying value, or cost, approximates fair value. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these assets as Level 3.


•	Equity investments include cost method investments for which fair value is not estimated. Carrying value, or cost, approximates fair value. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these assets as Level 3.

•

The carrying value of repurchase agreements and FHLB advances that mature in less than one year generally approximates fair value due to the short maturities. The Company holds $93.2 million of repurchase agreements and $2.5 billion of FHLB advances that are considered long-term. The Company’s long-term repurchase agreements and FHLB advances have floating rates based on an index plus a spread and the credit spread is typically consistent with those demanded in the market. Accordingly, the interest rates on these borrowings are at market and thus carrying value approximates fair value. The Company categorizes the fair value measurement of these liabilities as Level 2.

The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded or disclosed at fair value at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.



	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Assets
Available-for-sale securities	$	14,341,102	$	14,341,102	$	12,256,727	$	12,256,727
Trading securities	$	1,997,656	$	1,997,656	$	1,000,180	$	1,000,180
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	$	535,712	$	535,712	$	544,581	$	544,581
Mortgage loans held-for-investment in securitization trusts	$	1,744,746	$	1,744,746	$	792,390	$	792,390
Mortgage servicing rights	$	452,006	$	452,006	$	514,402	$	514,402
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,005,792	$	1,005,792	$	1,025,487	$	1,025,487
Restricted cash	$	336,771	$	336,771	$	401,647	$	401,647
Derivative assets	$	380,791	$	380,791	$	549,859	$	549,859
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	$	100,010	$	100,010	$	10	$	10
Equity investments	$	3,000	$	3,000	$	—	$	—
Liabilities
Repurchase agreements	$	12,932,463	$	12,932,463	$	12,250,450	$	12,250,450
Collateralized borrowings in securitization trusts	$	1,209,663	$	1,209,663	$	639,731	$	639,731
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	2,500,000	$	2,500,000	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities	$	90,233	$	90,233	$	22,081	$	22,081

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details